Tess Brady & June JohnstoneAsh Glaze Journal 2005Clay
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This work was carried out as part of a Diploma of Arts, Ceramics Arts Academy, University of Ballerat
The clay remembers the place where it was dug. We search for the coordinates Introduction
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ClayClays are blends which can be adjusted to enhance their plasticity, shrinkage, reaction to firing, colour and compatibility to glaze and engobes. According to Scott (1998: 25) clays are made up on four main ingredients- Clay, Flux, Filler and Opener.
Most commercially prepared clays provide information about firing temperature and are designed to minimize shrinkage and maximise compatibility with glazes. However all clays should be tested. Commercially Prepared ClayScott (1998: 22) when discussing plasticity and shrinkage of clays notes that water is always present in clay, even in dry clay and divides the water content into three main types. The water content contributes to clay shrinkage. Experiments to test the various shrinkage quality of clays were carried out on a variety of commercially prepared clays. Clay Shrinkage
Various merits of the claySculptural clay has the least shrinkage at both earthenware and stoneware firing. The small shrinkage at stoneware temperatures is significant. However it is the most strongly coloured of all the clays. This can be an advantage when fired at earthenware temperatures and the natural colour of the clay can enhance glazes and engobes. At other times when a white clay is needed the strong colour can be a disadvantage. TMK retained a whiteness which is also useful but it did not retain its flatness or shape. The RGH kept its shape and its flatness well. In addition it fires at stoneware to a light grey colour which would respond well to certain engobe and glaze work. Local ClayWanting to experiment with the local materials we decided to dig and prepare local Clunes’ clay. Clunes, an old gold mining town, is located in a minerally rich area. The local soil is thick, sticky, dark in colour. It is excellent for growing plants from autumn to spring but in summer cracks and dries out. Significantly the topsoil does not retain moisture well. We first looked for clay deposits along the creek bed asking local fossickers and fishermen for suitable locations. This proved to be a fruitless perhaps because the locals did not want us disturbing their favourite fishing or fossicking places. We then investigated an open cut hill at the back of the Clunes football oval. It contained clays and ochres of different colours: reds, whites and yellows.
We dug this clay, shifted it, ground lumps with a mortar and pestle and collected buckets of a fine redish power which we then mixed with water to form a clay. It kept shape and was very moist. We noted Daniel Rhode’s advice. “Adding the clay to the water, rather than the water to the clay, ensures that each particle of clay gets thoroughly wet and does not ball up into a sticky mass of partly wet, partly dry clay” (1962:49) Making buttons from the different colours we fired the clay at stoneware temperature. Button 1 – terracotta colour Button 2 – white Button 3 – darker red colour Button 4 - yellow to ochre colour
The colour variation which was marked in the raw clay state was lost in the firing process. Button 3 interested us the most. We liked both the colour and the way the button of clay kept its shape. Experiments with using the clayWe tried putting the ball clay 20%-Clunesclay 80% through an extruder but it broke up. We had a problem with the way the clay related to water. If we gave it enough to ensure it was plastic it proved difficult to shape. If we reduced the water it cracked and broke and lost plasticity. We introduced ball clay to our local clay at various percentages. We needed to first test the clay in small amounts and in such a way as to not damage other experiments in the kiln so we made buttons of the new clay and placing it on prepared tiles for fire testing. Apart from not adhering to the tiles, the clay, in all its forms behaved well indicating that additional experiments were productive.
Clunes Clay
As the ball clay is increased so too is the shrinkage. What was notable was the way the clay kept flat and retained its flatness and shape. At 20% we began working with the clay making a small pinch pot to experiment with the way the clay kept its shape in firing. The colour of the fired clay is a strong dark brown, reminiscent of raku clay. This is not surprising because of the large amount of iron in the clay. Subsequently 3 larger pinch pots were made. They bisque fired well. They were glazes, as per our experiments with glazing see below, and placed in the wood fire kiln. We note from Bernard Leach how clays are improved by souring and kneading. Rhodes stresses the advantages of keeping clay for a period of time because it produces bacteria. “The bacteria produces acid residues and promotes the formation of gels.” (Rhodes 1962: 52) The working of bacteria can be enhanced by adding some old clay to the new which speeds up the process. To this end we made up two batches of clay 80% Clunes clay and 20% ball clay. To one we added a small quantity of raku, kneading it in. To the other we let it sit. These will be worked on next semester. Our work with this clay is ongoing. We realised then that mixed with other ingredients this clay could form the basis of some interesting glazes. See Glaze Section for this work.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slips, Engobes and OpacifiersSlipsWe read up on slips and found Rhodes useful. “Slips glazes are glazes which are made wholly or largely from clays of low fusion point….Since all clay which a low melting point contain iron and other mineral impurities, slip glazes have colour range limited to tan, browns, and black.” (Rhodes 1962:186) Bernard Leach (1965:54) gives recipes for slips used at St Ives. Leach slip Slips for higher temperature have a limited colour range. We experimented with made-up Lismore slips in brown, tan, white and blue, on our raku ware, on our large busts and on the maquettes. On raku ware black, brown and tan Lismore slips were used.
Which was then dipped in Shina Shino glaze. This close up shows the double dipping forming the white glaze line over the tan and brown slips. Blue, white and tan Lismore slips were used. We noted how the slips did not run in the firing process. Below is a close up of the blue slip on raku clay with a Shina Shino glaze. The Shino glaze covered irregularly which is a feature of the final pot.
On another pot the tan slip was dipped in limestone glaze which created a contrast between the tan and white surfaces.
Using slips as colour on bustsBecause we were firing the busts at earthenware temperature we could experiment with coloured underglazes. We decided to use commercially produced underglazes which have the advantage of uniformity of colour because they are ground finely and the composition remain consistent. We combined blue, white, tan and black Lismore slips and a variety of commercially produced green underglaze pigments. The pigments were watered down slightly and applied with a brush. The slips were built up to give depth much as paint might be. Before firing:
On firing we found that the colour of the pigments and slips were faithful and met our expectations. After firing – a close up of the layering of slip colour to reveal a mask-like quality to the work.
In another work the sculptural clay was first covered with a layer of white Lismore slip which was used as an undercoat over the sculptural clay colour. The slip was applied in several coats.
It was then painted with a variety of underglaze pigments which were mixed with white Lismore slip as a base. The various colours were applied with brushes. The slips were then given a tin glaze which produced a Toby-jug look
Bringing the Slips Back to our LandscapeFeeling confident with slip application we experimented with using slips made of Clunes clay. We applied these to pots and platters. Below is an example of a platter first painted with Clunes clay slip then given a redgum ash glaze and fired to cone 10 at reduction. The glaze was base 4A and 25% ash.
EngobesUsing the recipes in Rhodes (1962:161), repeated in Currie (1985:152), we mixed up engobes for greenware, (wet and dry) and bisque ware.
Experiments with wet clay are forthcoming. On bisque firing the colours were insipid but we need to wait until we see the results after firing at cone 10. The dry greenware experiments can be seen below. Both examples have been bisqued and fired at cone 10. These were tested on prepared raku clay tiles because we wanted to test the engobes ability to cover coloured clay. We found a good coverage on the raku clay.
We then added colour which also gave a strong coverage on coloured clay. This time we used sculptural clay.
We tested for a pallet of colours using oxides. From Rhodes we took the following formulae (Rhodes 1962:162) Colouring Oxides in Engobes
The colour tests were carried out on test tiles by mixing 1% more colorant than given in the above table so as to achieve saturation to 100mils of uncoloured engobe. Then the colour was gradually diluted by adding one teaspoon of uncoloured engobe. This produced a run of up to 13 colours of decreasing intensity. The engobes were bisque fired and then fired to cone 10.
Note: The experiments with green (4% copper oxide), purple brown (7% manganese dioxide) and yellow (7% yellow iron oxide) were not successful. To achieve these colours further work is required. Engobes and GlazeWe carried out a series of experiments using engobes with our glazes on platters of various sizes. We experience crawling of the shino and oil-like pooling of the ash.
Wanting to continue our work on ash glazes we ceased working in this area. OpacifiersRhodes (1962:123) points out that glazes can be opaque from many causes. Opacity can be obtained by using oxides, as above. Opacifier on white clay
Opacifiers on sculptural clayHere we wanted to test the effect of the opacifiers on clay with a additional iron.
The titanium oxide (middle glaze) absorbed more of the iron in the clay and coloured giving a milky-brown mottled effect. Once again the best effects were between 1-3% for all oxides.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ash GlazesWe began by finding 6 base glazes which we found in Daly (1995:15). Of these we particularly liked his base stoneware glaze E Base Glaze 1ANepheline syenite 60 This became our Base Glaze 1A. It is a white mat glaze with attractive cracking in both reduction and oxidation firing at cone 10.
Another useful glaze was his base stoneware glaze D, which we refer in our records as base glaze 4A Base Glaze 4APotash Feldspar 63 We experimented using these and adding various colourants. These are recorded in our glaze records as experiments 6A-13A and will not be discussed here. We then tested the various fluxes because we wanted to see why we liked one base glaze over another. We tested nepheline syenite, potash feldspar, Cornish stone, soda feldspar, spodumene.
This was fascinating and we found our preference was for nepheline syenite at this time. We particularly like the nature of its opacity and its cracking. We were interested to see that it was the main flux in the base glaze 1A which we also preferred. The flux then in its raw state, and in its glaze recipe, reacted in a way we found interesting. It became our preferred flux. Additional uses of this flux can be seen in the section Experiments with natural materials, below.
Volumetric Blending - Biaxial Blends (Currie 1985:29)We carried out a volumetric blend to examine the differing effects of silica in relation to gradually differing amounts of feldspar, whiting and kaolin. We did the .6 feldspar test using base glazes
The glazes were exactly mixed as per Currie. The experiment was technically tricky to perform particularly getting enough of the glaze mixture on each part of the test tile and not let it overflow to the other section. It took us two attempts to succeed at this.
Currie (1986:61) wrote of the feldspar in this test being quite overpowering and of a matt pink effect on glazes 11 and 16. We did not observe this effect possibly because of variations in the temperature on firing. What we did observe however was a tendency in glazes 2-13 to crawl. Glazes 21, 26, 31 had translucent qualities. The glazes 22, 27 and 32 were highly crazed. Glaze 18 has a high sheen and on a curved or raised surface does not crackle. Experiments with natural materialsWe experimented with found materials and returned to our source of Clunes clay. To the clay we added coffee grinds because with June running a B&B she had a large source of these. We made a line test of coffee to Clunes clay -
The most successful result was the 20% coffee - 80% clay where the coffee integrated with the clay adding texture and colour. In the other experiments there was too much coffee and it separated in firing. We will continue our experiments using coffee and adding flux. In particular we will use Cornish stone because in our previous experiment with flux, (as above) we think its matt and speckled property will possibly be enhance by the coffee granules. It was of interest to us to hear a documentary about the work of ANU materials scientist Mr Tony Flynn who added coffee grounds to clay to form a primitive water filter. The clay could be fired at low temperatures, in for example a campfire using dried cow manure as fuel. Under these conditions the coffee grounds created minute holes in the clay which was then used successfully as a primitive water filter. (Radio Australia Innovations 4 April 2005) Ash experimentsWe became fascinated with the possibilities of ash glazes. For us the ash, particularly in combinations with our local clay, represented our landscape. For us, as noted by Elias (2005:6), ‘the Earth is origin’. Although we do not have the resources to be as exclusive as Steve Harrison (2004:30) who laments having to use 3% of bentonite mined not from his land, we sympathise with his attempts to create exclusively from the landscape. We engage with his concept of terroir. AshWood ash is made up of 10 to 15% alumina; 30-70% silica; up to 15% potash; up to 30% lime along with some iron oxide, phosphorus, magnesia and other elements depending on the source of the wood. (Rhodes 1962:188) Wood varied not only over species but also over climatic conditions and is further effected by cultivation. This is discussed in detail in Phil Rogers’ seminal work on ash glazing. (Rogers 1991) He comments: “Ash glazes are the most complex of all. This was, he said, because in ashes we are dealing with nature’s mixture.” (Rogers 1991:23) Our first experiments was to made a line blend of red gum ash and Clunes clay. The blend was from 100% ash to 100% clay in 10% intriguers. The firings were carried out in oxidization.
The most interesting glazes occurred at 60% ash and 70% ash. We then tested these further on prepared rings and tiles. Making 60, 65 and 70 percent ash glazes. The most successful 70% ash, 30% Clunes clay. It’s a golden honey colour which fills crevices well but which could cause some problem being so runny. It would need modification on anything but a flat tray- like surface. We found that we needed to sieve the ash and clay mixture more thoroughly to reduce the foreign material from the clay which was not burning off in firing. This made us aware that we need to investigate further various treatments and washing of the ash before use. We note that Rogers has a section dealing with this. Ash, clay and colour experimentsRevisiting the base glaze 1A and some of our earlier colour experiments we then decided to select the most successful experiments and try them in oxidation, reduction on white clay and on recycled clay. We wanted to see how the glazes worked over these variables in order to increase our understanding of the variables. The tiles were fired in oxidation; the rings in reduction.
These experiments are recorded in our glaze book as glazes 7A; 11A and 14A-24A From these we further developed 14A Glaze 14ABase glaze 1A In oxidation it creates a crystal-like surface in ambers to green. We tired it on a tray with indentations. We used recycle clay to increase the iron reaction. The glaze, dominantly green but ranges in colour to ambers. It is deep in the troughs of the tray and the crazing creates a crystal-like quality. It gives the effect of water and ice.
We also like the way Glaze 24 ran and the colours mixed forming a complexity. But they were very runny and needed to be further worked on a flat surface. Glaze 24 AMixture of 11A and 17A double dipping
We made a tray of recycled clay to increase the iron reaction with the glaze and doubled dipped. The double glaze over the large surface has potential. We noted the glaze works better on curved surfaces and this is quite visible on the tray. The problem now is the amount of glaze to use. In places the glaze is deep and mysterious, in other places the light blue takes over and the glaze is too thin. We need to further work on this to create a glaze that more resembles the sea or sky at night - a mass of blues swirling on each other and moving to grey and black. Glaze 21ABase Glaze 4A We really liked the effect of this glaze in both oxidation and reduction. To increase the effect of the glaze and the clay we decided to apply the glaze directly to a pinch pot made of Clunes clay and bisque fired.
The result pleased us. It is a complex glaze of creams to browns. It has a high sheen. The complexity and depth of the glaze as it reacted with the iron and other minerals in the clay creating patters and allowing the clay surface colours to at times come through - not unlike the effect of Shina Shino. We further investigated the effects of clay and ash on larger surfaces. We choose a prepared sculptural clay tray. We mixed a glaze of 30% Clunes clay and 70% ash and fired it at cone 10 in reduction.
The ash has melted well and the colour of the clay has muted its colour creating layers of different hues of brown. The glaze covered well but we could add even more to increase its complexity. This will form the basis of further experiments. The TriaxialWe then carried out a triaxial blend of red gum ash, Clunes clay and nepheline syenite. We followed the method set out in Currie (1985:87). We carried out this experiment on both white clay and recycled clay because we found that the ash reacts to the iron in the clay. The experiment was fired in oxidation.
This is our most successful and interesting experiment so far. There is a large variety between shiny, matt and crackled glazes in the blend. Glaze 18, (30 flux and 20 clay) created a shiny red button suitable for use in decorative work. Where as glaze 17, (40 flux and 10 clay) gave a button of brown with red specks. Glaze 12, (30 flux 10 clay, 10 ash) gives a matt finish with grey background and brown to black markings. There is a depth to this glaze. It is granite or rock-like. Glaze7 and 11 (40 flux, 10 ash & 30 flux and 20 ash) have similar characteristics. They are very crystal-like, so greatly crazed that they appear opaque. Glaze 7 is a yellow colour whereas glaze 11 is nearly clear. Glaze 6 (30ash, 20 clay) is a matt finish, layers of texture and colour predominately a muddy brown with a lighter brown flex. This would be interesting to experiment on a larger surface. This experiment has provides us with a rich source for further investigation and a fascinating pallet. We now want to repeat this experiment using different fluxes and clays. Ash Glaze Application ExperimentsDeveloping the triaxal results we mixed a number of glazes using a combination of % ash to either base glaze 1A or base glaze 4A. The glazes (ash: redgum; clay: clunes clay)
We applied these to 29 raku pinch pot cups. The raku was Blackwattle Buff Raku ; Walkers Raku Gold; Keanu White Raku. We recorded what glazes we applied to each cup and the method of application. These were then fired in the test kiln in two batches, one at cone 11 and the second firing at cone 9. Note the cone 11 firing included a soaking of 30 minutes. ResultsSeveral glazes ran and pooled in the cone 11 firing. There was a variety of colour and effects. Green glazesA shiny glaze with luminosity.
Blue glaze4A and 50 or 60 ash. This was enhanced with brown overtones where June’s glaze (12 triaxial) was flicked onto the glaze.
Pink glazePink occurred when base glaze 1A combined with another glaze- ie T3 or T5 when the dominant glaze was the base1A glaze. This resulted in a variety of effect always mat, often crackled and with pink tones.
Forest effectBase glaze 1A and T3 or T12 on light coloured clay produced a running effect like a forest – canopy or roots. They ran quite a lot and to achieve this effect wadding tiles need to be used.
Light flecks – cream-greenA very attractive lightly coloured glaze. On light clay with Base glaze 4A and 60 ash. This was added to by a rim of 5T.
W F effectOn a white raku pot with a dark raku foot Base Glaze 1A and 4T. The base glaze was applied and the 4T splashed on its side. There was crackling and a translucent blue in certain lights. Note on a pot which used this combination but put the 4T in the bottom of the cup the results were far less satisfactory.
Lismore SlipLismore slip is made of: and is coloured by adding For Tan For Blue For Black Applied on the outside of the pot in dot splashes. The slip remained as splashed - no running at all. For this use it was not satisfactory but elsewhere might create an interesting effect.
|
|
|
Clayworks TMK clay. The outside was T3 and T12, the kiln was soaked and reached cone 11. The white stoneware turned a terracotta reddish colour, probably a soaking of the iron in the Clunes clay in T3 and T12

We discovered that the first question to address with ash glazes and trays is the amount of ash and the nature of the ridges for the ash to fall into.
Best effects were obtained with the rolling-pin ridges- deep ridges in one direction.
Also it is better to not completely cover the tray with glaze, leaving the clay to engage and come through the glaze.
Darker clays produced a better effect.
On second firing we had failure and the complexity became muddled. We began a collection of failed trays.
We experimented with applying the ash directly onto greenware but found that the trays broke and cracked – the amount of ash and moister were too great.
Also we found that mixing box and redgum ash was unsuccessful particularly over trays which previously had been engobed and Shaner Shino (see below) glazed. The combination produced a dark engine oil effect.
Shaner Shino was developed by the US potter David Shaner:
Soda Feldspar 10.8
Spodumene 15.2
Kaolin 10.0
Soda Ash 4.0
Nepheline Syenite 45.0
Ball Clay 15
One tray was effective, best on darker clay. It was a combination of Base 4A and 24 ash over a slip of Clunes clay.
This was fired in a wood firing and also in a reduction normal firing.
![]() |
|
The glaze was consistent both times.
Glaze on darker clay
We made a triaxial of both redgum and box ash with silica and soda feldspar. There were two big additions to our pallet. In the box ash we found a light to quite azure blue occurring in T 9, 10 and 15. In the redgum triaxial we achieved red coppery colours. These occured in T 14 and 15. We decided to carry out further work with these glazes.
We then made quads using Clunes clay, redgum, dolomite and nepheline syenite and another using box ash. We fired these on both white and recycled clay but the results were not productive and we didn’t take the quads any further.
We isolated out 6 glazes from this work.
| 9 Box Triaxial 20 ash 20 soda feldspar 10 silica |
10 Box Triaxial |
15 Box Triaxial |
14 Redgum Triaxial |
15 Redgum Triaxial |
Black Garage Red Gum |
We then mixed up the glazes, sieved them and tested them on open pinch pots with a base of 1A and 4A. Unfortunately the sieving through the finest sieves removed much of the colour and produced a watered down effect. To the left is the redish effect of 14 Red gum triaxial on a base of 1A glaze. In the photo below, to the right is the soft blue of the box gum, 10 box gum triaxial on 1A glaze.

We then decided to not use such a fine sieve opting for either no sieving or a courser mesh. We also wanted to test the effects of the glaze running and so experimented on both beakers and trays.
We made a number of wadding tiles to assist in the firing.
Wadding: 60% calcined Alumina, 40% ball clay.
|
B9 Box Triaxial |
|
10 Box Triaxial |
|
15 Box Triaxial |
|
15 Red gum Triaxial |
After attending John Eagles workshop we are keen to experiment with our ash glazes but using thinner layers and building up complexity with different combinations.
We also want to experiment with different clays especially raku clays- this builds on our mulled wine cups.
We feel as if we have just scratched the surface of ash glazes.
Time |
Temp |
Gas |
Air |
Flue |
Comments |
9.40 |
0 |
.5 |
Cracked |
Open |
Used brick on flue |
10.10 |
140 |
1 |
2mm |
|
|
10.40 |
360 |
1.5 |
|
|
Removed brick |
11.10 |
560 |
2.5 |
5mm |
|
|
11.40 |
720 |
3 |
Full |
|
|
12.00 |
800 |
3.5 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
890 |
|
|
|
|
12.40 |
990 |
4 |
|
3” |
Reduction |
1.10 |
1080 |
|
|
|
|
1.40 |
1110 |
|
|
|
Green flame |
2.10 |
1140 |
|
|
|
|
2.40 |
1160 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
1160 |
|
|
|
|
3.40 |
1190 |
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
1230 |
|
|
|
Cone down |
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
off |
Time |
Temp |
Gas |
Air |
Flue |
Comments |
9.30 |
0 |
.5 |
cracked |
Open |
|
10.00 |
100 |
1 |
2mm |
|
|
10.30 |
300 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
11.15 |
460 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
11.30 |
520 |
2.5 |
5mm |
|
|
12.00 |
600 |
|
|
|
|
12.30 |
660 |
3.0 |
Full |
|
|
1.00 |
740 |
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
820 |
|
|
|
|
2.10 |
920 |
4 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
1040 |
4 |
|
5” |
Reduction |
3.00 |
1090 |
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
1140 |
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
1160 |
4.5 |
|
|
Good green flame |
4.00 |
1160 |
4.5 |
|
|
Good green flame |
4.30 |
1160 |
|
|
6” |
|
5.00 |
1200 |
|
|
|
|
5.45 |
1220 |
|
|
|
Cone down |
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
Off |
Time |
Temp |
Gas |
Air |
Flue |
Comments |
9.25 |
0 |
.5 |
Cracked |
Open |
|
10.00 |
140 |
1 |
2mm |
|
|
10.30 |
400 |
|
|
|
|
11.00 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
11.30 |
560 |
2.0 |
3mm |
|
|
12.05 |
710 |
2.5 |
5mm |
|
|
12.35 |
790 |
4 |
Full |
|
|
1.00 |
960 |
|
|
6” |
Reduction |
1.30 |
1040 |
4.5 |
|
5“ |
Orange green flame |
2.00 |
1190 |
|
|
|
|
2.30 |
1210 |
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
1245 |
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
1260 |
3.75 |
|
|
Cone down- soak |
4.10 |
1240 |
Off |
Closed |
Closed |
|
This kiln is naturally a reduction kiln and if the flue is closed over carbon builds up. To check this take plug out- if built up with carbon open flue.
However there are times when a little carbon is required and this tendency of the kiln can be played with.
Note the effect of the carbon build up on the rim of the bowl – a shino glaze fired in reduction.
|
|
31/8/05
Time |
Temp |
Gas |
Air |
Flue |
Comments |
10.00 |
0 |
.5x2 |
Cracked |
Open |
|
10.30 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
1x2 |
2mm |
|
|
11.30 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
600 |
2.5x5 |
3 |
|
|
12.30 |
860 |
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
920 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
1.30 |
1080 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
2.00 |
1120 |
3 plus |
Open |
10” |
Reduction |
2.30 |
1140 |
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
1150 |
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
1160 |
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
1190 |
|
|
|
|
4.30 |
1200 |
|
|
Opened flue |
Build up of soot |
4.55 |
1230 |
|
|
|
Cone bending |
5.20 |
1250 |
|
|
|
Soot burnt off |
5.40 |
1260 |
|
|
|
|
6.10 |
1240 |
|
|
|
Cone down |
6.15 |
|
|
|
|
Off |
Time |
Temp |
Gas |
Air |
Flue |
Comments |
9.30 |
0 |
.5x2 |
Cracked |
Open |
|
10.20 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
210 |
1x2 |
2mm |
|
|
11.00 |
580 |
|
|
|
|
11.30 |
610 |
2.5x2 |
3mm |
|
|
11.35 |
725 |
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
860 |
|
|
|
|
12.40 |
990 |
3x2 |
10mm |
10” |
Reduction |
1.20 |
1100 |
|
|
|
Yellow flame |
1.30 |
1100 |
3 plus |
Open |
Open |
|
2.00 |
1160 |
|
|
|
Orange flame |
2.30 |
1180 |
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
1200 |
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
1210 |
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
1230 |
|
|
|
|
4.55 |
1260 |
|
|
|
Cone bending |
5.25 |
1260 |
|
|
|
Cone down |
5.40 |
1260 |
|
|
|
Off |
In our reading of the journals we noted the sense of place is an important part of the work of many Australian ceramic artists. In particular we saw how Anita McIntyre’s work is described by Haynes (2005: 17) as “highly evocative of a particular place”, and later in the same article as “the intimacy of the individual’s experience of the landscape.” Further, Reece in his article appropriately titled Essence of Place (2005:75) writes of his own work “I am liberating and at the same time exposing the nature of soul of the ‘rock’.”
In order to further investigate our sense of place we organised a local pit firing to be held in conjunction with the CFA’s bonfire night.
The Clunes pit-firing was quite an event and generated interest among local artists and residents as well. A pit about 2 metres long by 60cm. in depth and a little over a metre wide was dug out close to the very large bonfire. The proximity to the large fire was an advantage as the fire acted as a giant windbreak sheltering the pots in the pit.
The pots were laid on top of hardwood sawdust and then covered with pinecones and shredded paper. Branches with dried twig material were laid on top of the pinecones. The fire was lit around 7PM and when everything was well ablaze, small branches continued to be placed on the pit at regular intervals for about 30 minutes.

The fire was very hot and the estimate of the temperature was somewhere between 900-1000 degrees. Some time later the pit was covered with a heavy mesh and tin was placed over the whole area to keep in the heat. The bonfire kept blazing overnight.
Next morning at 10.30.AM we inspected the pit. There had been no damage during the night from falling debris, or animals. The ash and coals in the pit were still very hot so we decided to leave inspecting the pots further until later in the afternoon, giving larger pots time to cool further before removal.

At 4PM (using industrial quality gloves) we started removing the pots from the kiln. To our delight only three of the forty pots fired incurred any damage. The bonfire had successfully kept the wind from cooling the pit and damaging large numbers of pots. One larger pot which had an effective finish from the firing unfortunately sustained a small crack.

The results of the firing were pleasing. With the experience gained from this firing we will modify the materials, and the way in which they were used so that there is a greater range of colour on the pots in a future pit firing. Pinecones hold heat so they are obviously a good choice of combustible material.

This event has been an excellent way to inform the community of another aspect of visual arts that until this time they had little knowledge or experience. Most people present were keen to find out how many pots survived the firing.
Lehman (in Ceramic Monthly 2001:ix-x) reflects: “It dawned on me that these pots, fired with this fuel, were perhaps more mine than any others I would ever make: precisely because of the Chinese elm. These trees had patiently, over a series of decades, grown on my land, absorbed the nutrients and solubles from my soil, been subject to the seasons of my climate. Then in the journey of the firing, these trees had given back to my pots the very solubles they had taken from my soil.”
Ceramics Monthly, Wood Firing, Journeys and Techniques: A Collection of Articles from Ceramics Monthly with a Foreword by Dick Lehman, The American Ceramics Society, Ohio, 2001
Currie, Ian Stoneware Glazes: A systematic approach Bootstrap Press, Maryvale Qld, 1985
Daly, Greg Glazes and Glazing Techniques: A glaze journey Kangaroo Press, Kenthurst NSW, 1995
Elias, Ann ‘Across the Generations’ The Journal of Australian Ceramics, July 2005 Pp6-7
Harrison, Martin ‘Country and how to get there’ in Who Wants To Create Australia Halstead, Sydney, 2004 Pp100-107
Harrison, Steve ‘From the Ground Up’ in The Journal of Australian Ceramics November 2004 P30-31
Haynes, Peter ‘Anita McIntyre- Recent Works’ in The Journal of Australian Ceramics, April 2005, Pp16-18
Leach, Bernard A Potter’s Book Faber & Faber, London, 1965
Radio Australia Innovations 4 April 2005 http//www.abc.net.au/ra/innovations/stories/s1339270.htm cited 18/6/05
Reece, Simon ‘Essence of Place” in The Journal of Australian Ceramics, April 2005 Pp 74-78
Rhodes, Daniel Clay and Glazes for the Potter Chilton, Philadelphia, 1962
Rogers, Phil Ash Glazes A&C Black, London, 1991
Sanders, Herbert H Glazes for Special Effects, Watson-Guptill, New York, 1974
Scott, David Clays and Glazes in Studio Ceramics, Crowood Press, Wiltshire, 1998
Sutherland, Brian Glazes from Natural Sources: A Working Handbook for Potters, Batsford, London 1987
Tichane, Robert Ash Glaze, New York State Institute for Glaze Research, New York, 1987
Page last modified November 2006